HOW LONG IS THE BATTERY LIFE FOR MAC PRO 2016 SOFTWARE
all day long - but the reality is that there's no software tweak in the world that will make a tiny battery into a bigger one. We can talk about software optimizations, Chrome vs. There's nothing more to this story than that. The truth is really simple: Apple put in a tiny battery (49.2 Wh) because they felt people wanted a thinner/lighter MacBook more than people wanted long battery life. I've had my MBP 13 (TouchBar) for about two months now, and based on all the furor around battery life I wanted to wait until I had sufficient hands-on time with it to make my own determination. The extra clock speed and GPU power (although Polaris is efficient) might not be worth the battery life tradeoff. I was thinking of exchanging my 15" for a faster build but I'm thinking it twice. I think most of us would rather they be several mms thicker in order to get a solid 10 hrs doing work. iPhones have suffered from low capacity batteries as well in sake of thinness. Especially with a maxed out build there is no way to get near the advertised battery life. I wouldn't call this "Battery-gate" but it is disappointing. It's crazy that the non TB 13" has 5 Wh more than the TB models which definitely consume more energy.
Honestly even though Skylake is much more energy efficient than Broadwell, Apple should have placed batteries with 75 Wh in the 13" models. Every single battery will have slightly different mAh, mV and Wh figures but they should all be within range. I don't know the exact voltage of any of the batteries but using 10.95v in a calculator I get 49.02 Wh which is close to the official 49.2 Wh spec.
0 kommentar(er)
